Latest Entries »


Rarely does one find a movie that so seamlessly meshes bone crushing violence with heart stopping beauty, but that is exactly what one finds in Unleashed. Directed by Louis Leterrier (The Transporter,Transporter 2) and written by Luc Besson (Taken, and The Transporter franchise), Unleashed skirted right under the general radar back in May of 2005, raking in only around 10 million it’s opening weekend, and just barely coming to 50 million in its national gross. Those kind of earnings only just managed to pay for the 45 million price tag for making the movie, and certainly did not inspire much buzz. However, often is the diamond looked over amongst the sparkling glass around it. That same weekend Monster-in-Law,Kicking & Screaming grabed the top spots above it, and the cinema waters were also muddied by the releases of Kingdom of Heaven the week before and Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith the weekend after. So it is not surprising that Unleashed did not get the recognistion that perhaps it so rightly deserved.

There is little doubt in my mind that the cast alone should have been enough to let the savy movie viewer know that this movie had something special going for it. Featureing such names as Jet Li (Fearless, Hero), Morgan Freeman (Invictus, The Shawshank Redemption), and Bob Hoskins (Who Framed Roger Rabbit, Ruby Blue) . These three actors alone command respect from a number of varied genres and their respctive fan bases. However, despite these three shinning stars, not to mention the endearing performance by a young Kerry Condon, who would go on to dazzle HBO viewers in the original serries “Rome”; Unleashed was still over looked as the wonderful work that it is.

Unleashed is the story of a man raised as a dog, an attack dog, complete with leash and kennel. Jet Li plays Danny, a simple young man raised from a child by Bart (Bob Hoskins), a local loan shark, to be one thing and one thing only; an attack dog. “Get them young enough, and the possabilties are endless”, this phrase is used more than once by Bart through out the movie. Bart took the young boy Danny and treated him like a dog, but also trained him to be a killer. And with the release of his collar that is exactly what Danny becomes. A very helpful tool to have for someone who collects money for a living. But, while a rabid killing dog is what Bart made of Danny, it is still not the sum of all that he is. While leashed he is very much a little boy still, unsure and submissive; until something very amazing happens, Danny hears the melody of a piano.

While on the job Danny is waiting to be called into action, and he comes into contact with a blind piano tuner named Sam (Morgan Freeman), they talk only briefly but it makes an impression on Danny. After a violent incident that leaves Bart apparently dead, Danny manages to get away and goes back to the last place he saw Sam. Sam takes him in and he ,along with his musicaly gifted step daughter Victoria, bring Danny into a world he could not remember from his childhood, a world he had forgot exisited, a world of love and  family.

Along with Sam and Victoria, Danny slowly begins to become a person again and with each day the killer within begins to slip away, but he still does not dare to take the collar off for fear of what he may do to those he has come to love. Also, Danny’s mind is opening as he is exposed to the piano music that Sam and Victoria play around him, his mind begins to wander back to a time, to certain notes, and finally to small memories of his mother.

But life is never simple, and in time Bart returns and discovers that Danny is still alive and comes for him. Suddenly Danny’s new life of love and family is brought violently into odds with his old life of death and violence. Can Danny lose the collar and the violent life that went with it, or is he a dog, a killer, always waiting for the call of his master and the click of his collar?

Unleashed is an amazing demonstration of how to appeal to two vastly different audiences while not alienating the other. The action scenes are exactly what we have come to expect from Jet Li and his stunt and fight company. The battles are seamless and amazing to behold as his dance of martial arts and movement bring the story into a full blown adrenelin rush of action packed awe. However, the fight sequences make up only a small portion of the story because to my mind the the true beauty of this story is the music and how it shapes and colors the enviroments that Danny finds himself. This film has two sides to it, the gritty, bloody, violent side that takes place whenever Danny is with Bart. On the flip side we see Danny happy, growing, and loved while he is with Sam and Victoria. These two sides are illustrated beautifuly in the score.

Jet Li is amazing as he switches from Danny to the violent dog at the click of his collar. The most enjoyable part of his performance may be his portrayal of innocence and child-like wonder as he is shown the world he never had at the hands of Morgan Freeman and Kerry Condon. Morgan Freeman is the quentisential father figure in this touching piece where he takes in what is essentially a wounded dog and helps bring him to a healthy loving place. Kerry Condon is charming and lovely in this film and her interaction with Jet Li is very sweet, but nothing is more beautiful than the moments they share at the piano. With the good comes the bad, and Bob Hoskins plays an amazing bad guy, you love to hate him because while Bart is a horrible character, Bob Hoskins brings so much life and color to this villain that he makes it a pleasure to watch the monster at work.

Over all I highly reccomend this movie to anyone who loves a good action film, but does not want the movie to be all fight and no substance. The fighting skill in this movie is only matched by the beauty of the acting and the wonderful piano music. Beauty and violence mesh in an intricate dance set to a master pianist’s masterpiece in this incredible movie and you should definitely take a look, and that’s how I see it.

If you enjoy this film you should check out:

The Professional

The Transporter

The Fifth Element

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Advertisements

For a couple of years now, there has been a lot of talk about the super rich funding their own space programs in order to boldly go where only those with years of training, teams of scientists backing them, and a nationally sponsored program have been able to go before; space.  Sadly with N.A.S.A. losing a lot of its funding, the best alternative is for our space program to fall into the hands of a few extremely rich geeks and thrill seekers who want to ride their money all the way out into space.

Well, it seems the time is fast approaching where the rich and powerful will soon be able to see what it is like to break away from the earth’s gravitational pull and experience the majesty and awe inspiring infinity that is space…. and then  market it to the rest of us. Last Thursday the V.S.S. Enterprise, yes, it is named after that particular Enterprise, completed its’ maiden test flight with crew. For the complete story look here.

In reality I am of two minds on this particular story, on one hand I’m worried that the future of space exploration and possibly colonization will eventually be in the hands of private companies or worse, private individuals. Maybe it’s the years of repeatedly being told that private companies in space only lead to really really bad decisions; AlienAliensAvatar. Yes, they are only movies, but movies are generally based on repeated archetypes throughout history. So, the concept of large corporations sacrificing anything and anyone to get what they think is theirs is common enough. Add to this the difficult nature of governing and regulating something out in space, could also add to my discomfort. Or maybe it is the sense of elitism that seems to go along with any venture where only the extremely rich are allowed to enjoy the fruits of this particular tree. In any event my concerns are mostly based on a far-reaching future that more than likely I will not be around to see. Still, my concern is valid in my opinion.

Now, as I said, I’m of two minds on this matter, so on the flip side of the situation I’m very excited. Truthfully I was born when the zeal of space exploration was beginning to wane, even with the added boost of our finally reaching Mars with out rovers, space exploration has begun to drop off of the national agenda. The problem I think is that because N.A.S.A. has been doing more of the same for the most part and not getting the funding that might allow them to accelerate their progress, the national populace has grown disenchanted with the Space program as it is. In a very simple, but I feel accurate, assessment of people today, we’ve seen too many advances in Terran technology that we used to think only possible in movies, that we are beginning to demand the same progress in our extra terrestrial endeavours, and with out some real financing, this is not going to happen. This is why I am for these Rich entrepeneurs stepping forward to help the waning drive for space.

True, at first only the super rich will be able to enjoy this particular luxury, at 200,000 a pop these rides will either be for the financial élite, or for someone’s last hurrah before they leave this world… in a permanent sense. However, in time the technology they are developing to ferry the rich to the stars, will be improved and expanded upon and the drive for space will be revitalized. And instead of  our youth of today fighting to get a job at one space program, N.A.S.A., they can apply to different companies and get more chances to help create that next step that will take us out into the next generation of space exploration.

I can only hope that the machinations of the rich and powerful will not get in the way, because as worried as I am about the control of humanities space program falling into a few rich individuals hands, I’m even more worried that this new program will fall before it can truly fly, because of investors, Ceo’s, or politicos trying to stop it in order to get their hands on the reigns of what could be the next big industry.

Yes, I missed the real space race, I was not alive to see man’s first steps on the moon, but I have been alive to see humanities imaginations go wild and weave countless stories of exploration and colonization of space. Mine is a generation of dreamers who want to see the stories of our youths made real around us. Why else do you think the ship in this story is named after the star ship U.S.S. Enterprise from the Star Trek franchise? We want to boldly go where no one has gone before. We want to travel space where we can finally be truly free like Malcolm Reynolds in his Serenity. We want to see new words and new civilizations at the side of an excellent guide like The Doctor. True, while all of these characters and worlds are fictional, they still inspire us, and that is what we need; inspiration, real hope that our dreams shaped by our fiction could be achieved in some form or fashion. So that is why I am glad that the V.S.S. Enterprise had a succesful test flight and I wish it many many more, and that’s how I see it.

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Just like any other night,  you begin to go through  your routine, step by step,  the same old hum-drum  life. Another day another  dollar life style is what you  are used to, but on this  night, for no real reason,  one decision, one final  choice changes everything  and sends you spiraling  down into a world where  nothing you know is true  anymore and the only way  out, is to become someone  you never thought you  could be. That is what  happened to Max when he  decided to pick up Vincent  in his cab.

Collateral is an edge of  your seat action suspense  movie that pulls you into a  dark, night time world  where harsh and terrible  actions are countered with  polite, philosophical  conversation. In it  we look at the lives of two men, one a skilled, calculating hit man who looks at his life with a cold logic that allows him to freely go about his bloody life without any question of conscience. The other, a simple man with far-reaching dreams mired in a poor 9 to 5 life. And one cab ride brings them together in a dangerous nerve biting story of death, life risking decisions, and revelations of two men’s true character.

Collateral came out in 2004 and managed a modest 24 million opening weekend and managed close to 218 million in world-wide gross. It starred Tom Cruise, of Knight and Day and Valkyrie, as Vincent; a gun for hire who has come into town two complete a list of hits for his client. Unaware of his alterior motives at first, Jamie Foxx, best known for his work in The Soloist and Ray, plays Max; a simple cabbie working the night shift, agrees to be Vincent’s ride for the night, but after a body drops on his cab at the first stop the illusion is destroyed and he is pulled along at gun point to complete Vincent’s work.

As they go about Vincent’s business the two men talk about why Vincent feels his work is justifiable and why Max has never gone further in his life. Max tries to talk Vincent into seeing the wrongness of his life while Vincent shows Max just how weak he is letting himself be. As the two go from one hit to another Max becomes more and more of the man that he could be, if only to survive to see the morning. The problem is, as Max learns more and more about what Vincent is doing in town and why, he realizes that one of the names on his list is the woman he just met earlier in the night. Annie , played by Jada Pinkett Smith, is a prosecutor who is unaware that her case is going to get her killed and that the only person who can save her is the cabbie she flirted with on her way to the office.

The city streets along with the wonderful score, supplied  by Destino De Abril, provide the perfect back drop for this wonderfully unwinding story of violence draped in civility. This movie demonstrates Tom Cruise’s ability to assume varied character styles as well reveals the true acting ability of Jamie Foxx. Truthfully before this movie I had no respect for Jamie Foxx, as this movie came out before Ray, but this film really allowed him to showcase his versatility and ability to really make you feel for a character, because as cool as the character of Vincent is, it is Max’s story and it is his journey that really makes you love this movie.

So, if you are looking for a movie that draws you not only into the lives of the character portrayed, but the world they are living and dying in, then Collateral is the movie you should take a look at, and that is how I see it.

If you like this, you might enjoy:

Man on Fire

La Femme Nikita

Law Abiding Citizen

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Director Christopher Nolan, best known for his previous blockbusters such as The Dark Knight and  The Prestige, has  apparently done it again with his latest summer film début, Inception. Already showing big numbers and high turn out,  Inception has garnered the lion share of the weekend box office numbers with a stunning 60.4 million dollar opening  weekend. With numbers like that Inception has already outstripped the summer movies that have already hit the big  screen. Barring franchise movies such as Iron Man 2, and revamped movies such as The Karate Kid, Inception has made  an incredible financial mark in the league of new ideas, which I am very glad to finally see. In a summer of less than  stellar live action movies, it is very heartening to see one finally rise up and take a step forward in a new direction, and we  are all lucky enough to go along with it.

Box office standing aside, what is this movie about one might ask. In truth that is the question everyone should be  asking as this movie is a roller coaster ride of intrigue, special effects and quite literal mind bending story  telling. Inception takes place in a world where technology has given us what could be the greatest gift or the greatest  weapon in mankind’s history, the technology to allow someone to enter the mind of anyone, through their dreams. In this  world we follow the exploits of a man and his team who are considered the best at what they do, that being stealing  information from the minds of influential people. Dom Cobb, played by Leonardo DiCaprio, leads a special team of thieves who are generally hired to extract the most private, and sometimes dangerous thoughts, memories, or information from whom ever he is being paid to steal from. The catch is, that a mind is a dangerous place when you don’t have the road map and so his services do not come cheap, or without a cost. His life of notoriety at this particular skill has also made him a high-profile thief riding high on the worlds most wanted list for the “mind games” he’s been playing at the behest of others in this newest form of corporate espionage.  His life is the work, having lost everything that he used to be with every extraction he has performed. However, one last job could turn that all around, and give him back the life he once had.

This job is not like anything he has ever done before tho, instead of going into a mind to steal, he is going there to plant an idea, an idea that could represent the perfect crime for whomever plants the seed. However, Dom Cobb and his team are getting more than they bargained for as they are being teamed up with Ariadne, played by Ellen Page of Juno fame, who is supposed to possess an incredible architectural mind, a skill highly useful when manipulating a dream world. One can only hope this is true, because it seems that there is some outside force playing against them, predicting every move they make and trying to turn the mind of a multimillion dollar oil company heir into a labyrinth of traps and illusions that could leave everyone’s mind in ruins. Can Dom Cobb successfully plant the seed of inception in this heir’s mind and find redemption and the life he once had, or will this outside enemy from Cobb’s past bring his dreams crashing down, while he is still in them?

This movie features a talented cast of actors who flesh out this incredibly written story. Joseph Gordon-Levitt, star of (500) Days of SummerKen Watanabe, best known to American viewers from his work inLetters from Iwo Jima and Memoirs of a Geisha, and Cillian Murphy ,who last teamed up with Nolan in The Dark Knight, make up just a few of the wonderful actors that help bring this strange and intrigue laden world to life.

Inception is a mind thriller in more ways than one. Christopher Nolan has created a story that demands the viewer’s attention in order to follow this particular rabbit down the rabbit hole. You may not catch everything the first time you watch it, but you will most definitely want to watch it again. Inception plants itself into the viewers mind and germinates a strong love for the movie that will keep you coming back for more, and that’s how I see it.

If you enjoy this movie you may also like:

The Dark Knight Memento

The Prestige Following

Batman Begins Doodlebug

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Coming out in theaters today is what I’m thinking might be one of this summer’s top  grossing movies, Despicable Me. Granted, that is not saying much as this summer has  been a bit of a bust in hollywood as most of the big “blockbusters” have fallen flat on  their million dollar faces in the box offices of America. In truth the animated films of  this year’s summer movie season have done far better than their live action counter  parts.Shrek Forever After, Toy Story 3, How to Train Your Dragon; the animated movie scene has  been cleaning up the box office money this summer only being out shined by a few  movies such as Iron Man 2 and The movie that I will not name for fear that it’s crappy  writing and glittery vampire drones will infect my blog. In any case, these kinds of  numbers make me believe that Despicable Me will out shine the rest and really bring some  new life to the faltering summer movie scene.

Despicable Me features the talented voice acting of Steve Carell , best known for his  rolls in The 40 Year Old Virgin, and “The Office”, as he takes on the roll of the star  “villain” in this cheeky family movie where an out-and-out self viewed evil master mind  named Gru seeks to lead his army of quirky minions in his greatest and most devious  plot yet, to steal… THE MOON! Muahahaha… sorry. However, Gru’s devious plot is  met with the unanticipated road block made up of three young orphans, played by Miranda Cosgrove,  Dana GaierElsie Fisher, who are placed in his care. What Gru discovers as he tries to juggle his plans to pull off his most evil plot yet, and manage three precocious little girls is that there might be more to life than freeze rays and world domination.

The cast of characters assembled for this movie seem up to the challenge of bringing this monstrous villain to a very happy ending for all families that come to see it. With Jason Segel, of “How I Met Your Mother” and Forgetting Sarah Marshall fame, playing Gru’s arch rival Vector, and broadway and hollywood starlet Julie Andrews playing Gur’s mother the over all casting gets only better with the other voice talents brought to bear through out the movie.

I admit that the initial theatre release trailers had me wondering if I would even be interested in watching this movie as they seemed to only focus on the rivalry  between Gru and Vector, but with the more recent trailers that have been airing lately, in which we learn about the three girls and their role with Gru, I feel like this has more of the makings of a family classic, one that children can easily see with their parents and the parents will not want to shoot themselves for seeing with their kids.

As this is Sergio Pablos first attempt at writing, one can hardly judge the merit of his skill, however,Ken Daurio has more of a track record with his Script writing and with movies such asHorton Hears a Who! and Bubble Boy under his belt, one can bet this movie will carry with it the same family enjoyment that those movie provided.

The 3D element of the movie will more than likely have little in the way of an effect on the success of the movie. 3D seems to be the way the movie industry is going once again now that it has been improved from its red/green glasses of yesteryear. However, I find that the 3D element in a movie does not do much more than make the visuals more fleshed out and realistic, true it can really make a scene pop with beauty or reality, but it will not save or break a movie. As I said, more movies are using this as a tool in their arsenal to bring people into the theaters, so in time it will become quite common place and more than likely will lose its current “wow” factor.

I believe tho, that “Despicable Me” is going to garner some great box office numbers and really bring the movie goers back in to see it again and again. I know I am looking forward to it, and that’s how I see it.

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


The battle of the bulge is more than a famous war campaign in WWII, it is also the ongoing fight against over eating, and weight gain. A battle that, according to the National Center for Health Statistics in January 2009, has left 34 percent of Americans obese, compared to 32.7 percent who are overweight and 6 percent that are “extremely” obese. We have more diet plans than healthcare plans in America, and as with both none of them seem to work for everyone. Exercise has always been the great stand-by for weight loss and with television shows such as “The Biggest Loser” and“Losing It with Jillian” coming to us in high quality HD it would seem that more people should be motivated to take control of their life and follow the examples shown them on the TV. Then again, it still comes down to will power and sadly with most Americans the flesh is capable, but the will is weak.

And so the battle continues, yo-yo dieting, inconsistent work out routines, fasting followed by bingeing followed by fasting again. Is it any wonder why we as a nation are viewed as having the most unhealthy life style of any modern nation? We do whatever we can to excess, except the things that we should do. We drive to excess when we could just as easily walk that 200 yards from one store in a shopping center to the one across the parking lot. We eat to excess because that all you can eat buffet is only 4.99, and we want to make sure we get out money’s worth, when instead we should actually learn up on portioning our meals as well as spacing them out, and not starve our selves most of the day and have that big fast food feast at the end of the work day. We also lounge to excess, we give up on any out doors plans we had in order to stay in and watch the pretty pictures on the big screen. When in reality, most daily activities that could have a huge impact on your health take no more than an hour to do. Is it convenient, generally not, but it is important.

Meanwhile, while all this debate over what is the proper way to live a healthy life style, and how much is too much exercise, eating, fast food, carbs, proteins, ect. The business world is out there coming up with flash in the pan ideas to try to get your money by praying on the hopes and insecurities of a worried and over weight populace. They throw out everything from magic pills that are supposed to burn off fat calories, to mystical never before seen training tools that will firm and build your muscle tone with the minimalist effort on your part, only 4 easy payments of 19.99 and not available in stores… well not for at least 8 months then you will find them all over the place at your local Wal-Mart, Walgreens, or CVS. It is rare that anything comes out that will actually help you and is not a temporary fix.

Which brings us to todays new brand of weight loss magic. Is it real, does it work? Well, as it says in the bottom of the article, the only way to know is for you to try it and decide.  The Sprinkles Diet. We all know the adage “you are what you eat” but are we now looking at “you are what you smell?” I can really believe some the reasoning behind this article. Smell is one of the most powerful and often underrated sense that we posses. Smell triggers memory stronger than sight, and it really does cause stronger cravings as well as turns us off our hunger faster than visual stimuli. I know if I walk past a restaurant and the favorable smell of some delicious meal comes wafting my way, I am quickly put in the mood for that meal and grow very hungry for it, and the longer I wait, the hungrier I get and the more and more I visualize I am going to want to eat. At the same time, take me in the same situation, walking down the street, I smell the wonderful smell outside the restaurant, I’m craving, I’m hungry, and then as I keep walking I pass by the alley  and the most horrid stench of three-week old rotten garbage hits me like a punch to the hypothalamus. My cravings are killed and I’m hoofing it to get away from the stench. So yes, I can really see the reasoning behind the science of this product. The problem is…. where is the science?

After reading this I thought is very interesting idea, but as I looked it over again I could not see exactly where it describes what the heck those little crystals are doing. “Sensa acts imperceptibly to speed up the natural satiety process, which prevents overeating,” Ok… but how? This article throws out nice sounding words and phrases  like successful studies, and double-blind, placebo-controlled study. These make us feel the product is very official and incredibly proven, but those very same terms can be found on just about any diet pill on the market, and we know how successful all of those must be. I still say the scientific information in this products pitch is lacking. The most scientific that the articles goes is talking about the hypothalamus and it’s control over your hunger. That is not the science of this product, that is a biology lesson. What the heck are these little crystals made of? They claim Sensa is made from absolutely no drugs but that is as far as they go with that route of information. The truth is they don’t give us one ounce of useful information that does not revolve around their sales pitch, or their “impressive” study reports. They even state that with the double-blind placebo controlled study they found that the “results very similar to Hirsch’s, with an average weight loss of more than 27 pounds.” They then quickly follow that up with the whole, to know for sure if it works, you need to try it. So in essence they did not tell us how much of that average of weight loss came from the control placebo group, and how much came from the folks on the donut sprinkles. That’s not the kind of vagueness I like to see in my information.

Now, I’m not saying this stuff does not work, who knows, I mean I have not tried it myself to see, as they so strongly encourage,  but I do know that the brain is a very powerful and often unexpected organ and that it is capable of more than we sometimes give it credit for. That is why placebos work in the first place, we believe something so strongly that our brain makes it so. This is why when dealing with something in the brain that is supposed to be, according to this product, as responsible for our over eating as the hypothalamus is proposed to be; I feel hesitant about anything that does not explain it self fully and inform the buyer just why it is the product and not the brain on its own that is responsible for this incredible weight loss.

Bottom line, people with weight issues want to believe in and want to grasp so strongly to a quick and easy fix to their problems that they see these kind of products as the miracles they have been waiting for and they buy into it with out a second thought or glance, not really wanting to know the science or the full disclosure of the findings around these products, because if they know that they might learn that the promoted results are skewed, or that the successful results were lost mere months after the subjects stopped using the product or diet, sometimes gaining more weight than they initially had. The truth is, there are only a few truly successful weight loss plans, and not one of them is a quick fix. Most require discipline, self-control, and above all an ability to mentally drop the habits that brought them to the unhealthy place they are in now. Until they come out with a miracle pill that does all that, I’m going to take the longer road towards my health goals. It may be longer, but I know that in the end I will enjoy the results all the more and for a long time to come, and that’s how I see it.

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Brick: a Detective movie by Rian Johnson

I admit I love a good Noir film. Sit me down and give me some across the tracks hero, a        stunning fem fatale and boat load of intrigue and I’m hooked. Dropping names like “The Big Sleep“, “The Maltese Falcon” and “Dark Passage” would put anyone on the right track of  finding great and well-known noir films to sink their teeth into. However, “Brick” did not get the  popular attention I think it deserves, and if any movie has the capability and the moxy to become  a cult noir classic, it is this movie.

Brick is also interesting because it takes a story style that was popular in the 1940’s and  modernizes it to a more present day atmosphere without killing any of the style’s architecture or  altering the classic and well-loved archetypes of the genre. The movie takes place in your  average mid-west high school and focuses on the path of Brendan Frye, a kid on the out skirts of  popular school society, but who has an ear and a finger on all the different clicks that make up  the culture of high school. The central hub of the story lies in the mysterious death of his former  girl friend. As he goes off the high school “grid” to find out her story and learn who is  responsible he ends up taking us all on a dark trail of deception and half-truths that keep us  wondering who’s side is the right side, who can you trust, and finally what lengths does  someone go for lost love?

With out a doubt I am a fan of the language used in this movie, like its’ genre has always  given us, this movie is rifled with turns of phrase and jargon that paints the gritty, bluff them or  beat them, life on a pin style of this movie better than any set designer could hope to capture.  Listening to this movie is more than being entertained by the story, which is good enough to  keep you glued, but also about listening to an even flow of words that mix and mesh and force  your mind to really think about some of the terms used in order to really grab hold of the  situation.

The characters make up a gallery of interesting, multi-layered, and hard-boiled  individuals so enjoyable and convincing that you give high praise to the casting director Shannon Makhanian, also responsible for Hatchet and The Brothers Bloom, for assigning such excellent young actors to play the parts. From Joseph Gordon-Levitt (recently starring in (500) Days of Summer) who plays our lonesome hero Brendan, to the features fem fatale Laura, played by the lovely and provocative Nora Zehetner of “Grey’s Anatomy” and “Heroes” notoriety.  Also in this we find our local king pin of crime in this suburban area, ironically enough called  “The Pin” played by Lukas Haas, and his number one henchman Tug, played by Noah Fleiss.

How are these people involved in the murder of Brendan’s ex? What is this “brick” everyone keeps referring to and how will Brendan find out all the answers he needs before someone drops the dime on him as the murder of his ex-girlfriend? To find out all of this and more I highly recommend going out and renting this provocative whodunit. Or move it to the top of your Netflix line up, I can pretty much guarantee if you like a good murder mystery, or are also a fan of the noir film genre, then you will enjoy this movie.

Below I’m going to give you just a little taste, but remember, the first taste is free, the rest is up to you to.

I give “Brick” a 4.5 out of 5 stars, And that’s how I see it.

If you like these movies you will more than likely enjoy this one, and vice versa is true.

The Lookout

Mysterious Skin

The Brothers Bloom

Hard Candy

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


So, I came upon this story today as I was clicking through the news stories, and being the geek that I am I was of course drawn to this particular article. http://www.cnn.com/2010/TECH/gaming.gadgets/07/06/light.saber.lucas/index.html?hpt=C2

First, I should say that I have a strong beef with George Lucas, I think he could not direct his way out of a paper bag, and that if he ever had any skill when it came to writing scripts, it has long since left him upon completing the first three Star Wars movies.

Be that as it may, I find his actions here particularly pathetic. Here he is taking the weight of his multi million dollar company with all its assets and support and laying into a 7-year-old laser business for producing a hand-held laser that by his estimation, and that of the tech blogosphere, appears to bear a close resemblance to a lightsaber. Really George? Really? You are going to raise a stink over this?

I can understand, as Steve Liu, CEO of Wicked Lasers, suggested, that a large corporation such as Lucasfilm needs to protect its interests because it has a lot of stock holders, and that if they let this slide they will have allowed grounds for another company, later down the line, to attempt to cash in from the cache that the all too famous laser swords would bring in. The problem is, that this is a company that makes hand-held lasers; not designed for the average consumer but for certain and specific fields of work. Personally, I don’t see a Christmas time commercial in the works featuring two kids in their Christmas best sitting on Santa’s lap in the mall asking for the new and totally awesome Spyder III laser. Cut frame and there they are Christmas morning each holding their brand new Spyder III swinging it around, pretending they are Darth Vader or Luke  Skywalker, all the while  setting fire to the house and sending the blazing white-hot light of the strongest hand held laser Wicked Lasers has produced in recent years through the Christmas tree and carving out lines in the dry wall. This image, while comical, does not appear plausible. So why then is it that Lucas is so determined to squash this laser. Can he really be that afraid that those specific consumers in the fields of work where this particular style of laser would be necessary, are going to buy it solely on the fact that some consider it to bear a resemblance to a lightsaber? If that is the case, what about flashlights? Who has not seen, or been, a child holding a flash light in both hands waving it about and pretending it was a lightsaber. Some flashlights even bearing a very strong and specific resemblance to the franchise’s prized weapon of choice. Yet, these items, which are readily available, and like the Spyder III laser, not being advertised as bearing any connection to the lightsaber, are left alone in this blood thirsty hunt?  Is it because it is actually a laser and can burn through items much like the lightsaber? Is it because it has features on the item itself that make it easier to grip like many pictures of a lightsaber depict, even tho it would only seem wise to place such safety precautions on such a high-powered laser? Where is the line drawn, at what point do you allow technology to be technology and progress as it needs to, and at what point do you continue to harass its creators because what they are making seems, in a small percentage of people’s minds, to bear a slight resemblance to your “creation.”

The truth as I see it is that Lucas has had only a few properties that can guarantee to continue making money. Star Wars is chief among them. One might suspect that his goal is to prevent any type of competition between his licensed and controlled fiction, and the real world. Why else would anyone make a stink over this when A: no one at Wicked Lasers was trying to draw a parallel in their advertising. B: The only folks who were creating a parallel were the tech bloggers and reviewers, but guess what, tech geeks are almost 99% guaranteed to have seen Star Wars and treasure those movies as a high point in their childhood, it is only natural that they try to compare modern-day advances with the much-loved images of their youth. This is going to continue to happen as we move forward with technology. C: This issue would have gone right under the radar of most of the nations populace if Lucas and his company had not created the big issue over it in the first place.

So What am I saying? Simply this, George Lucas needs to get a little dose of reality and try to actually think before he sets these kind of actions into motion. If he really wanted to make some money he could have sent in some feelers to see if he could get in on the revenue of the product by actually sponsoring it as opposed to trying to kill something that in reality was never a threat to his licensed  material anyway. Perhaps he could take the money he saves from these ill-conceived notions and put them towards more productive and profitable ventures…. like hiring a  real writer and director to handle any movies he plans to put out in the future and keep his jar jar binks loving, crystal alien skull flaunting, actually thought having a young Anakin Skywalker be portrayed as a whinny little emo brat and thus destroying for many one of the most awesome and well-loved movie villans ever.. hands out of the movie making business forever.

At least, that’s how I see it.

Thanks to Doug Gross of CNN for the well written article.

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Greetings,

First entries are always so stereotypical that it hard not fall right into the same old jargon used over and over in these kind of things. So I’m going to try my best to make this first entry more relevant and to the point. My purpose in this endeavor, my mission statement if you will, is to simply write about my views and impressions on the many things I encounter in my day-to-day life, a simple opinion column in most respects.  I will discuss books, movies, music, and on occasion the news of the day.

My goal here is not to incite or instigate any kind of  hate speech, nor do I want to kick the pebble that starts an avalanche of argument and rhetoric…. the main stream media does that just fine on their own for the most part. No, instead I simply want to write about how I feel or think on certain topics. If you decide to comment on them, and I hope you do, then please keep said comments at a respectful and well-mannered level. Failing such maturity I will simply delete your comments so that others do not have to deal with it.

My ambition is that with enough time and effort this venue will help me to cultivate a writing career in journalism or free-lance writing. If this will pan out, only time will tell. Till that time we shall all just have to wait and see. I hope you will join me as I work toward this goal, and I fervently hope you will enjoy the ride as much as I plan to.

And that’s how I see it.

© David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it, 2010. Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to David Carl Dobbs and How Dobbs Sees it with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.